Menu Home

Micromorts and microlives

How do you effectively communicate risk when something is risky over the medium or long term? Measure the risk in micromorts (the one-in-a-million chance of dying) and microlives (half an hour of extra life).

Skydiving

CT Snow from Hsinchu, Taiwan [CC BY 2.0], via Wikimedia Commons

So, for example, skydiving will set you back 8 micromorts. In other words, each skydive has roughly an 8-in-a-million chance of killing you. Running a marathon? That’s 7 micromorts. Giving birth? 120 micromorts, or 170 if by C-section. I wonder if that would change our attitude to women’s health, if we pointed out that it’s just as risky to give birth as it is to go skydiving fifteen times in a row?

Related to this concept is the microlife: a unit of measurement that represents half an hour of life expectancy. Lose a microlife, and you will on average die half an hour earlier. Gain a microlife, you’re living a half hour longer. Watching television for two hours? You just lost a microlife. Eat five servings of fruit and vegetables? You gained four microlives (if you’re a man) or three microlives (if you’re a woman).

So, how much is a micromort worth? A 2009 study attempted to put a dollar figure on the micromort: how much money would people accept to take a one-in-a-million risk? $50, as it turns out.

 

Categories: Economics & business Health & medicine Sciences Weights & measures

The Generalist

I live in Auckland, New Zealand, and am curious about most things.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: